Home
entries friends calendar user info Previous Previous Next Next
Qualified Perceptions - Five books (one trilogy)
firstfrost
[info]firstfrost
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Five books (one trilogy)
The Big Over Easy (by Jasper Fforde)
So, there's the murder investigation into the death of Humpty Dumpty, which is a firmly tongue-in-cheek forensic police procedural. (I think there's a gaping huge forensic hole, as it turns out, but it's very spoilery). Then there's the plot about the Detective Guild, which is all about having the sidekick write up your adventures and publish, so investigations which are photogenic and involve lots of Innovative Clues and Confessions at the End are vastly preferred. I liked the first Thursday Next quite a lot, but thought they went downhill; I think this is about as much fun as the first Thursday was, though it's a bit of a different style (more of an old-fashioned mystery, less of a thriller). Four and a half stars.

The Braided Path: The Weavers of Saramyr, The Skein of Lament, and The Ascendancy Veil (by Chris Wooding)
I wonder, if I call it a curate's egg of a trilogy, will anyone know what I mean? It should be a grand lovely epic; full of betrayal and characters of dubious honor, full of noble striving and characters of self-sacrificing loyalty, full of horror and characters of blackest evil. And it has all those, and a sweeping arc of rebellions (both the good kind and the bad kind) and mystic rituals and toppling empires and everything. Despite all that, and a generally competent writing style, the story still doesn't pull me in, and I'm not sure why. It might be that the characters of dubious honor are a little too opaque - not only am I not sure which side they're on, I'm not sure which side I'm supposed to mistakenly think they're on. It might be that the characters of blackest evil are a little too evil - they're a seriously creepy horror theme in what is otherwise a game-of-houses / adventure story. I don't think it's actually the occasional Really Odd turn of phrase, but I must quote this one anyway. Someone has just been killed, and his soul is joining the Weave, the all-purpose magic/spirit concept: "There was only the growing golden light, and the threads that seemed to sew through everything, wafting him like fallopian cilia towards what lay beyond oblivion." Overall, three stars, with patches of three-and-a-half and patches of two.

Only Forward (by Michael Marshall Smith)
I have never properly appreciated Philip K. Dick's novels (though I tend to really like the summaries on the back cover). Similarly, I'm always a little dubious about books that win Philip K. Dick awards; there's always a little too much "what the hell?" obscuring the plot. And Only Forward has an awfully pretentious bit of puffery on the back cover. But that's really all I have bad to say about the book. It starts like a ... zany semi-violent noir over-the-top surreal future city, like a Richard K Morgan story with clown noses for everyone. The snarky elevator, and the color-coordinated neighborhood and noting that while the narrator's cat was multi-talented, he had never yet tidied the apartment... bah, it's hard to capture in brief quotes the breakneck-speed fireworks going by. The narration is casual and quirky and fun, and the adventure is pretty compelling, and the characters likeable. That's when the story sets its hooks. So by the time the author kicks the legs out from under you and takes things off in a new direction (through some "what the hell?", of course) the hooks are there to pull you along. And then the plot does an Immelman turn into an entirely new dimension, pausing here and there to drop some of those metaphoric and poetic Truths (I'm not totally sure they're true, but they're definitely Truths) that stay with you long after you forget the details of what happened, and it finally comes in for a reasonably solid landing. The changes of direction do slow things down a bit (some Amazon reviewers quite disliked the middle bit), and there's a lot more horror and haunting sadness than in the first section, but I still liked it all. It's not my genre of choice, but I couldn't put it down. And, dear God, it's his first novel. Five stars. (I was recommended this book by [info]rifmeister, who was recommended it by Ireland Lass. Only reading it months later, I promptly recommended it back to rifmeister, having forgotten the whole thing.)

Tags:

Comments
From: (Anonymous) Date: September 13th, 2007 02:03 pm (UTC) (Link)
For full reference, the recommendation came originally from [info]jofish22. I really enjoyed Smith's other books as well, though some lean further into horror than others. (Spares was quite dark)
desireearmfeldt From: [info]desireearmfeldt Date: September 13th, 2007 02:21 pm (UTC) (Link)
Now I have to ask about "curate's egg," as it's not a turn of phrase I've heard before. (All I can think of is "cuckoo's egg," which is clearly not quite what you're trying to convey... Is the point that curates are traditionally poor as church mice and therefore might have tiny or nonexistent eggs to their tea?)

And I must tease you for two lengthy (for you)reviews that say lots of interesting things without ever once hinting at what the books might be about. :) (OK, I guess you told us there were rebellions in the trilogy.)
firstfrost From: [info]firstfrost Date: September 13th, 2007 02:31 pm (UTC) (Link)
It's about a rebellion with magic rituals, overthrowing the evil empire and its own magic rituals! I totally told you what it was about! :)

rif's review gives the couple-sentence plot summary (except he says Hitchhiker's Guide instead of clown noses). But I found that any summary I tried to write both didn't do it justice and was somewhat misleading.
firstfrost From: [info]firstfrost Date: September 13th, 2007 02:34 pm (UTC) (Link)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curate's_egg gives a description of the origin of the phrase, plus the old meaning versus the new meaning. (Essentially, it's "has good bits and bad bits")
desireearmfeldt From: [info]desireearmfeldt Date: September 13th, 2007 05:21 pm (UTC) (Link)
So...does that mean the bad bits spoiled the good bits (old def) or the good bits were worth reading even though there were bad bits too (new def)? :)
5 comments or Leave a comment
calendar
Back July 2009
1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031
Knitting Works In Progress

tags
links
page summary